Articles Summary Assignment Essays - Education, Psychology

Articles Summary Assignment What are the main arguments Machiavelli makes in his book? Do you agree with him? Niccolo Machiavelli was an aristocrat, which his fortune wavered according to the shifts of power in Florence. He contrasts luck and character to the reality of one's fortune and virtues, though he had bad luck in regard of the midicis. The book prince was written in attempt to ingratiate himself with the new prince of Florence. He mentions how a prince can have good qualities and argues about how the prince should behave. His first argument was about "The prince's duty concerning military matters". He argues that the prince must not have any object or thought and must only be profession in wars as he was born to guide and train himself to defend his country in those wars. The second argument was about "Generosity and Miserliness". In this point Machiavelli argues that a prince must consider being generous as a good manner. And it's necessary for him not to neglect any possible means of lavish display. Another main argument is "To Be Loved Than To Be Feared", he argues that its better to be feared than to be loved. He says that a prince needs to avoid being hated but still need to be feared. And to achieve this point he must stay a way of two things, people property and women of his citizens and his subjects. He also adds that a prince should keep his words and promises to live integrity and do not deceit an d must care about people, as they must trust him as well. Finally, I do agree with Machiavelli, as these qualities are important to build a prince personality and to appeal to the community in good characteristics so they return it by trust, love and being faithful to him. What constitutes an intelligence (according to Gardner)? Howard Gardner, a professor at Harvard University, dedicated a program to improve education by emphasizing many fields in education, art, and technologies. One of the most known projects that he had done was "Theory of Multiple Intelligence". Gardner defines MI as the ability to solve items on tests of intelligence. It shows an underlying ability in both adults and children. It also entails the ability of solving fashion products that are consequence in particular cultural setting or community. This allows one to approach a situation with a goal to be obtained. Moreover. MI is framed in the light of the biological origins of each problem-solving skill. Gardner writes some evidences that intelligence is about normal development in gifted individuals like the breakdown of cognitive skills under conditions of brain damage, idiots' savants, autistic children and many other studies. Gardner suggests that the traditional notion of intelligence, based on I.Q. testing, is far too limited. Instead, he proposes seven different intelligences to account for a broader range of human potential in children and adults. These intelligences are: Musical Intelligence. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence. Logical Mathematical Intelligence. Linguistic Intelligence. Spatial Intelligence. Interpersonal Intelligence. Intrapersonal Intelligence. In the end, these different fields in intelligence assures that each person have a specific pathway that they can show their abilities and be creative in them. You don't have to be smart on all the fields because you're diffidently natural and Describe one life-changing incident in Douglass's narrative and explain its implications (how did it affect him?) David Douglass was a slave born in Maryland, he achieved a lot of things and one of the most important achievements were that he died as a free man and was respected by the community. In my opinion, I think the thing that has an absolute affect in Douglass life was when he lived in Master Hugh's house. He in that time learned how to write and read that was an accomplishment, which no slave could do. His mistress was a pious, warm, and tenderhearted woman. She was new in what they called slavery, instead of treating them bad, she had bread to the hungry, cloths to the naked, and comfort to others. She treated Douglass in a good manner and was like a regular teacher to him. Even though she changed and the slavery finally got to her, she still gave Douglass a reason to live as a human not a slave. Because

Cooperative Learning Models

Cooperative Learning Models Introduction Despite the numerous learning strategies adopted in schools, cooperative learning has been identified as the most efficient. This strategy of instruction and learning has been adequately adopted in many academic institution as well as corporate institutions for educating people.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Cooperative Learning Models specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The advantages of this learning process are extensive. It has been observed that cooperative learning gives students the opportunity to acquire academic, social and cognitive skills in an efficient and effective manner. Cooperative learning has been identified to be highly advantageous in the sense that it helps students to solve problems together as well as solution to conflicting ideas. Individual weaknesses and difference in learning process can be adequately countered through the adoption of cooperative learning thus making it an effi cient learning strategy. There are various cooperative learning models which can be efficiently adopted by the teacher for instruction. Some of the main cooperative learning models include; the Graffiti model, the jigsaw model, the academic controversy model and the student teams-achievement division (STAD) model. Despite the numerous efficiencies of each of the cooperative learning models, each is endowed with varied characteristics. This essay will compare and contrast the above highlighted cooperative learning models. The four cooperative learning models including the; Graffiti model, the academic controversy model, the jigsaw model, and the student teams-achievement division (STAD) model have a high sense of commonness. An analysis of the four models of cooperative learning indicates that each of the models is aimed at ensuring integration of students’ ideas in the classroom. The concept of working together as a group in the classroom is explicitly demonstrated by each of the model. This aspect depicts the similarities of the models in enhancing supportive cooperative learning. In the case of graffiti model, students are offered a chance to work in groups on previously identified topics and questions. This helps students to share individual and group knowledge on the topic. This scenario is also depicted in the jigsaw model whereby students are divided into groups and each member assigned with some piece of information. This individual information is integrated together with those of other members thus making it possible to realise the class objectives collectively. In the case of academic controversy model, students are offered adequate freedom to express their understanding on a certain topic.Advertising Looking for essay on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This creates an open forum for debate, discussion and conflict of ideas thus leading to sharing of information. On t he other hand, the student teams-achievement division (STaD) model also replicates the other models in the sense that it is based on team learning. Students are in this case divided in teams of about five and assigned with specific topics for discussion after which they present to the whole class. On the contrary, the various cooperative learning models have demonstrated significant differences. This is based on the nature of the teams adopted in instruction as well as distribution of materials or information to be discussed. In the graffiti model, students are required to discuss in groups previously identified topics. Each group is supposed to make summaries on all class’s responses. A special aspect of this model is that it ensures face-to-face interactions and positive interdependence among the students. This is in contrast to jigsaw model whereby students are offered with different materials to discuss and share with their colleagues. Academic controversy model on the ot her hand entails open discussion among students, whereby they share their knowledge and experiences on a certain question or topic. In the case of student teams-academic division (STaD) model, students study in groups. These are heterogeneous and representative groups of the entire class. After the group discussions, the information or results of each groups is discussed to the whole class. Conclusion In summation, it has been clearly evident that cooperative learning is one of the most effective learning strategies. This form of learning ensures smooth integration of student’s knowledge in the classroom. Student gain a lot of experience and knowledge on social, cognitive and academic skills. The concept of group work is embraced in cooperative learning whereby students are able to solve problems together. The different cooperative learning models have demonstrated a high sense of similarities in terms of group discussion and collaborative learning. On the contrary, the mode of execution of each model is different this making each model to be distinct.